10/31/2024   English German

  Edition # 155  
San Francisco, 10-31-2024


Figure [1]: This toilet at the town square of Noe Valley originally cost 1.7 million.

Michael Our neighborhood, Noe Valley in San Francisco, is known to be almost at the center of the peninsula on which the city spreads out. However, hardly any tourist knows about our little oasis, a well-preserved small village with its own marketplace, amidst a decaying city where chaos has reigned for years due to misguided policies.

Figure [2]: Here is our neighborhood Noe Valley on a map of San Francisco.

On our town square, a weekly market now takes place every Saturday, where farmers from the surrounding area sell high-quality organic goods to a well-to-do clientele. During the week, there are small tables with chairs on the square, where, strangely enough, you hardly see any homeless people lingering. Instead, it seems to be frequented only by the higher-earning city crowd, who apparently take a break after strolling through the fashion boutiques on 24th Street. Amazingly well-behaved children are playing under the supervision of their nannies on the slide of the playground.

Figure [3]: The newsletter reporter is monitoring the construction work on the famous toilet.

An idyll, a jewel of urban planning! Only one thing was missing until recently: a public toilet, as the surrounding restaurants generally only allow guests to use their facilities for cost reasons. It so happened that in 2018, the then-supervisor Matt Haney pulled a plan out of his pocket to build the toilet. But of course, a simple portable toilet cannot stand in the prestigious marketplace of Noe Valley; we're not at the Wacken Open Air heavy metal festival! So, several designs were solicited, and the best one was selected and approved.

The fact that the planned 20-square-meter monument to detoxification was now supposed to cost a whopping 1.7 million dollars did not deter Supervisor Haney, because, as is well known, our city requires 42 paid permits for every little thing, and for any construction project, 17 different unions have their hands out. This may seem grotesque to you now, but in San Francisco, the Department of Public Works, the Mayor's Office on Disability, the Arts Commission, the electricity provider (PG&E), the city planning committee, and many other organizations actually charge exorbitant fees for opaque paperwork and assessments before such a project even takes shape. Furthermore, by law, only highly qualified union workers are allowed to carry out the construction work.

Nevertheless, Matt Haney had already organized the 1.7 million, with the money set to come from the city and state tax coffers, and the project was, as they say, in the bag. Matt Haney had since made a career move, rising from city council to become a government representative in Sacramento. Surprisingly, however, our otherwise not at all stingy Governor Gavin Newsom found the toilet costs to be exorbitant and abruptly cut the state of California's involvement. This put the project on hold for the time being. A wild hunt for sponsors began, and a toilet company from Nevada offered to construct the facility for free. The only problem was that the San Francisco city council had previously declared with great fanfare that they would no longer do business with states like Nevada, as Nevada did not fully implement San Francisco's noble LGBTQ laws. Parbleu!

Figure [4]: The newsletter reporter inspects the interior and finds nothing glamorous.

With their backs against the wall, the city fathers relaxed their moral demands on the policies of other states, and the toilet was delivered, with two different companies taking on not only the construction but also the lion's share of the union-extracted construction costs. The city contributed only $200,000, also to unionized construction workers.

Currently, the "Toiletgate" affair has already made waves across the US, and also a Wikipedia article about the public restroom in Noe Valley has existed for some time now (not written by me, by the way). Nowadays, when traveling as a California resident to other states, it's not uncommon to be confronted with such 'typically Californian' nonsense with eye-rolling.

Figure [5]: Even the New York Times wrote an article about the marketplace toilet in Noe Valley.

Even the renowned daily newspaper, The New York Times, has already covered the topic. And former President Trump recently used the topic as campaign rhetoric, as evidence of failed policies on the part of the Democratic Party. Being the roving newsletter reporter in charge, I have recently tested the toilet, which is only about 500 meters from our house, and I can confirm that it works. However, I would not classify it as top-notch, as I have seen much more appealing constructions even on hiking trails in the middle of nowhere.

RSS Feed
Mailing Liste
Impressum
Mike Schilli Monologues


Get announcements for new editions

New editions of this publication appear in somewhat random intervals. To receive a brief note when they're available in your mailbox (about once every two months on average), you can register your email on the 'usarundbrief' Google Groups list.

Your email address



All Editions:
2024 153 154 155 156 157
2023 148 149 150 151 152
2022 143 144 145 146 147
2021 138 139 140 141 142
2020 133 134 135 136 137
2019 129 130 131 132
2018 125 126 127 128
2017 120 121 122 123 124
2016 115 116 117 118 119
2015 111 112 113 114
2014 106 107 108 109 110
2013 101 102 103 104 105
2012 96 97 98 99 100
2011 91 92 93 94 95
2010 85 86 87 88 89 90
2009 79 80 81 82 83 84
2008 73 74 75 76 77 78
2007 66 67 68 69 70 71 72
2006 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
2005 54 55 56 57 58
2004 49 50 51 52 53
2003 43 44 45 46 47 48
2002 36 37 38 39 40 41 42
2001 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
2000 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
1999 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
1998 7 8 9 10 11 12
1997 1 2 3 4 5 6
1996 0

 

Send us a comment
We'd like to hear from you, please send us feedback if you want to comment on the content or have suggestions for future topics.

Simply write your your message into the text box below. If you'd like a response from us, please also leave your email. If you want to stay anonymous, simply put 'anonymous' into the email field. This way we'll get the message, but we have no way to respond to you.

Your email address


Message

 
Contact the authors
Latest update: 14-Jan-2025