 |
| Angelika/Mike Schilli |
|
Angelika The question that everyone asks: What can, wants and will Donald Trump actually implement from his election promises? One thing is certain: through him, the Supreme Court of the United States will experience a stronger conservative swing, as in the event of new appointments to the nine highest judicial positions, the president plays an important role.
Since the death of Justice Antonin Scalia in February 2016, the Supreme Court has had an open seat and two of the more liberal justices, namely Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer, are already quite elderly. Ginsburg is 83 years old and not very healthy. Breyer is already 86 years old. And Justice Kennedy, who once took a more liberal stance but then again often sided with the conservatives, is also already 80 years old. Supreme Court justices can wear their robes as long as they want; there is no mandatory retirement age. Most of them actually die of old age in office.
The position of Scalia, who passed away in February, should have been filled long ago. This has not happened, as the Senate is also involved in the nomination of new judges, and most Republican representatives refused to consider Judge Merrick Garland, whom President Obama had nominated as his successor.
This completely undemocratic behavior was not punished by voters on November 9th, however. Trump can now nominate a candidate for Scalia, and since the Senate has a -- even if narrow -- Republican majority after the election, this is likely to be more in line with the party's agenda. The Judiciary Committee of the Senate will first question the proposed candidate, and if the committee deems them qualified, the nomination will be put to a vote in the full Senate. Usually, confirmation requires only a simple majority. A so-called filibuster, the political strategy in the Senate to delay votes through endless talking, can lead to the need for a supermajority of 60 votes to reach a decision. Whoever Trump nominates as a judge, the candidate will eventually land in the Supreme Court, postponing the change is not possible, at most delaying it.
|
|
|
|
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
All Editions:
2023 148 149 150 151 152
2022 143 144 145 146 147
2021 138 139 140 141 142
2020 133 134 135 136 137
2019 129 130 131 132
2018 125 126 127 128
2017 120 121 122 123 124
2016 115 116 117 118 119
2015 111 112 113 114
2014 106 107 108 109 110
2013 101 102 103 104 105
2012 96 97 98 99 100
2011 91 92 93 94 95
2010 85 86 87 88 89 90
2009 79 80 81 82 83 84
2008 73 74 75 76 77 78
2007 66 67 68 69 70 71 72
2006 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
2005 54 55 56 57 58
2004 49 50 51 52 53
2003 43 44 45 46 47 48
2002 36 37 38 39 40 41 42
2001 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
2000 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
1999 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
1998 7 8 9 10 11 12
1997 1 2 3 4 5 6
1996 0